Brennan takes final shot at Trump: 'I leave his fate
to our judicial system, his infamy to history, & his legacy to a trash
heap'
Celine Castronuovo
Former CIA Director and vocal Trump critic John Brennan on
Monday took to Twitter to announce that he now plans "to ignore
Trump," and will "leave his fate to our judicial system, his infamy
to history, & his legacy to a trash heap."
© YouTube Brennan takes final shot at Trump: 'I leave his
fate to our judicial system, his infamy to history, & his legacy to a trash
heap'
"For four years, I spoke out
vigorously against Donald Trump's craven dishonesty, corrupt pursuit of
personal interests, & trampling of our democratic principles,"
Brennan, who served under the Obama administration, began in a series of
tweets. "After serving over three decades in national security, I felt
compelled to condemn Trump's depravity & incompetence."
"My outspokenness has brought
criticism, retaliation by the Trump Administration, & threats by those
blinded by Trump's demagoguery," he continued. "Yes, it is unusual
for a former CIA Director to speak out, but when an autocrat descended upon the
White House, silence was not an option for me."
"I now plan to ignore
Trump," Brennan added. "I leave his fate to our judicial system, his
infamy to history, & his legacy to a trash heap."
My outspokenness has brought
criticism, retaliation by the Trump Administration, & threats by those
blinded by Trump's demagoguery.
Yes, it is unusual for a former CIA
Director to speak out, but when an autocrat descended upon the White House,
silence was not an option for me.
And while I will refrain from
referencing Donald Trump in Twittersphere again, I will not hesitate to
denounce public officials of any political stripe who I believe betray the
trust of the American people or engage in unethical, unprincipled, or corrupt
activities.
I promise.
Brennan called for "strong
bipartisan support" for the national security policies that will come from
the administration of President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala
Harris once they take office in January.
On Monday, Biden announced a list of
people he intends to nominate to head up
his national security team, including Antony Blinken, a longtime foreign policy
adviser, to serve as secretary of State; Alejandro Mayorkas to serve as
Homeland Security secretary; Avril Haines to be director of national
intelligence; and Jake Sullivan to be national security advisor.
Brennan added in a follow-up tweet Monday
that while he "will refrain from referencing Donald Trump in Twittersphere
again, I will not hesitate to denounce public officials of any political stripe
who I believe betray the trust of the American people or engage in unethical,
unprincipled, or corrupt activities."
"I promise," the former
top national security official added.
Brennan's Twitter remarks come after
the ex-CIA director argued earlier this month that President Trump was
"score settling" with
personnel changes at the Pentagon, which began with the firing of Defense Secretary Mark Esper, followed by a series of resignations of other top officials.
"He wants people to be
personally loyal to him," Brennan said in an interview on CNN at the time.
"So therefore the firing of Mark Esper and the decapitating of civilian
leadership within the Pentagon, I think clearly is score-settling on the part
of Mr. Trump."
Sources reportedly told CNN's Jake Tapper that the White House had focused on
pushing out Esper's undersecretaries after Esper and his team argued against
withdrawing troops from Afghanistan.
Acting Defense Secretary Christopher
Miller hired a senior adviser who frequently pushed for the immediate removal of troops
from Afghanistan, and, last week, Miller announced that Trump had ordered the
Pentagon to pull 2,500 U.S. troops from
Afghanistan and Iraq by mid-January.
Some experts have warned that such a
rapid withdrawal would threaten national security and stability in the region,
with the military frequently arguing against going below the 4,500 troops
currently in Afghanistan.
Military officials have said that
conditions on the ground do not warrant a drawback of troops, with the Taliban
failing to uphold its agreement with the United States for peace in the
country.